On Naturalness, Innateness, and God-beliefs: A Reply to Shook
Shook (2017) argues that if god-beliefs are “innate,” one is obligated to be skeptical about them by virtue of their mutually incompatible plurality and nativist origin. Second, Shook suggests that even if god-beliefs are not innate, it is still epistemically vicious to believe in gods. Shook also r...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 电子 文件 |
| 语言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| 出版: |
2017
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2017, 卷: 29, 发布: 4/5, Pages: 374-386 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
神
/ 信念
/ 天赋观念
/ 自然宗教
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AE Psychology of religion |
| Further subjects: | B
cognitive science of religion
epistemology
god-beliefs
innate
religion
|
| 在线阅读: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Publisher) |
