Rationalizing our Way into Moral Progress

Research suggests that the explicit reasoning we offer to ourselves and to others is often rationalization, that we act instead on instincts, inclinations, stereotypes, emotions, neurobiology, habits, reactions, evolutionary pressures, unexamined principles, or justifications other than the ones we...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Summers, Jesse S. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2017]
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2017, Volume: 20, Issue: 1, Pages: 93-104
IxTheo Classification:NCA Ethics
ZD Psychology
Further subjects:B Psychological explanations
B Moral Progress
B Explanatory and justificatory reasons
B Rationalization
B Real reasons
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1565753186
003 DE-627
005 20171128082955.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 171128s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-016-9750-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1565753186 
035 |a (DE-576)495753181 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ495753181 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Summers, Jesse S.  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Rationalizing our Way into Moral Progress  |c Jesse S. Summers 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Research suggests that the explicit reasoning we offer to ourselves and to others is often rationalization, that we act instead on instincts, inclinations, stereotypes, emotions, neurobiology, habits, reactions, evolutionary pressures, unexamined principles, or justifications other than the ones we think we’re acting on, then we tell a post hoc story to justify our actions. This is troubling for views of moral progress according to which moral progress proceeds from our engagement with our own and others’ reasons. I consider an account of rationalization, based on Robert Audi’s, to make clear that rationalization, unlike simple lying, can be sincere. Because it can be sincere, and because we also have a desire to be consistent with ourselves, I argue that rationalization sets us up for becoming better people over time, and that a similar case can be made to explain how moral progress among groups of people can proceed via rationalization. 
650 4 |a Explanatory and justificatory reasons 
650 4 |a Moral Progress 
650 4 |a Psychological explanations 
650 4 |a Rationalization 
650 4 |a Real reasons 
652 |a NCA:ZD 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 20(2017), 1, Seite 93-104  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2017  |g number:1  |g pages:93-104 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-016-9750-5  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9750-5  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 20  |j 2017  |e 1  |h 93-104 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2988318085 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1565753186 
LOK |0 005 20191104151039 
LOK |0 008 171128||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053747  |a ZD 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL