After Zedekiah: Who and What was Gedaliah ben Ahikam?
This article offers an historical and archaeological reconstruction of the person and status of Gedaliah ben Ahikam recounted at 2 Kgs 25.22-26 and Jeremiah 40-41. It builds upon Joseph Blenkinsopp's recent (2013) defence of the controversial theory, first proposed by Miller and Hayes (1986), t...
Publié dans: | Journal for the study of the Old Testament |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Sage
[2017]
|
Dans: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Année: 2017, Volume: 42, Numéro: 1, Pages: 73-91 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Bibel. Könige 2. 25,22-26
/ Bibel. Jeremia 40-41
/ Gedalja, Personnage biblique
/ Juda (Royaume)
/ Roi
|
Classifications IxTheo: | HB Ancien Testament |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Gedaliah
Exile
Mizpah
Babylone
Judah
Nebuchadnezzar II
Jeremiah
Zedekiah
Neo-Babylonian Judah
|
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | This article offers an historical and archaeological reconstruction of the person and status of Gedaliah ben Ahikam recounted at 2 Kgs 25.22-26 and Jeremiah 40-41. It builds upon Joseph Blenkinsopp's recent (2013) defence of the controversial theory, first proposed by Miller and Hayes (1986), that Gedaliah was installed at Mizpah as a Judahite client king of Nebuchadnezzar II. It suggests that elements of Joel Weinberg's (2007) more conservative reconstruction can be applied constructively to the hypothesis of Gedaliah as Judah's non-Davidide king. Future studies of Neo-Babylonian Judah must take seriously the possibility that there was, for a while, a rump Kingdom of Judah established around Mizpah in Benjamin. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0309089216667386 |