The Pronoun in Tripartite Verbless Clauses in Biblical Hebrew: Resumption for Left-Dislocation or Pronominal Copula?

The status of the third person pronoun as a third element in verbless clauses has been a much studied issue in the history of Biblical Hebrew syntax. As with most intriguing grammatical phenomena, scholarly opinion on this issue has shifted considerably over the last century or more. While the ninet...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Holmstedt, Robert D. 1972- (Author) ; Jones, Andrew R. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press [2014]
In: Journal of Semitic studies
Year: 2014, Volume: 59, Issue: 1, Pages: 53-89
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1563041367
003 DE-627
005 20180731111303.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170904s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jss/fgt035  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1563041367 
035 |a (DE-576)493041362 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ493041362 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1043192425  |0 (DE-627)770218342  |0 (DE-576)321465695  |4 aut  |a Holmstedt, Robert D.  |d 1972- 
109 |a Holmstedt, Robert D. 1972-  |a Holmstedt, R. D. 1972-  |a Holmstedt, Robert 1972- 
245 1 4 |a The Pronoun in Tripartite Verbless Clauses in Biblical Hebrew  |b Resumption for Left-Dislocation or Pronominal Copula?  |c Robert D. Holmstedt 
264 1 |c [2014] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The status of the third person pronoun as a third element in verbless clauses has been a much studied issue in the history of Biblical Hebrew syntax. As with most intriguing grammatical phenomena, scholarly opinion on this issue has shifted considerably over the last century or more. While the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries witnessed adherents to both copular and non-copular analyses for the ‘pleonastic’ pronoun in the so-called tripartite verbless clause, the second half of the twentieth century saw a consensus emerge, influenced particularly by the arguments of eminent scholars like Muraoka and Goldenberg: there was no pronominal copula in Biblical Hebrew. In this paper we argue that this position does not adequately account for the data from linguistic typology or comparative Semitics and does not reflect a sensitive reading of the discourse context of many biblical examples. 
652 |a HB 
700 1 |a Jones, Andrew R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of Semitic studies  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1956  |g 59(2014), 1, Seite 53-89  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341339423  |w (DE-600)2066649-4  |w (DE-576)100202497  |x 1477-8556  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:59  |g year:2014  |g number:1  |g pages:53-89 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1650626088  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jss/article/59/1/53/1736088/The-Pronoun-in-Tripartite-Verbless-Clauses-in  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgt035  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2979343676 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1563041367 
LOK |0 005 20180129135121 
LOK |0 008 170904||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044128  |a HB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a BIB  |a REL