IS DOOYEWEERD A PANENTHEIST?: COMMENTS ON FRIESEN’S ‘95 THESES ON HERMAN DOOYEWEERD’

What is the purpose of Friesen’s 95 theses and what is the audience he has in mind? The title refers to a major church historical event and suggests that — like in 1517 — we are dealing with a concise statement of a new and radical doctrine that is unfolded in opposition to an established canon. But...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Glas, Gerrit 1954- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2009
In: Philosophia reformata
Year: 2009, Volume: 74, Issue: 2, Pages: 129-141
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562255436
003 DE-627
005 20220604142823.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22116117-90000468  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562255436 
035 |a (DE-576)492255431 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ492255431 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)1037989864  |0 (DE-627)756512387  |0 (DE-576)177635940  |4 aut  |a Glas, Gerrit  |d 1954- 
109 |a Glas, Gerrit 1954- 
245 1 0 |a IS DOOYEWEERD A PANENTHEIST?  |b COMMENTS ON FRIESEN’S ‘95 THESES ON HERMAN DOOYEWEERD’ 
264 1 |c 2009 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a What is the purpose of Friesen’s 95 theses and what is the audience he has in mind? The title refers to a major church historical event and suggests that — like in 1517 — we are dealing with a concise statement of a new and radical doctrine that is unfolded in opposition to an established canon. But who is the opponent in this case? What is the established canon that is rejected? And what is new or radical in the summary? Dooyeweerd’s philosophy was definitely new and radical at the time of its conception. It still has an enormous potential for the special sciences. It offers important resources for any (transcendental) critique of ‘immanence’ philosophies. However, on first reading and without knowledge of the context, Friesen does not seem to aim at offering a new or radical interpretation of Dooyeweerd’s philosophy. I read the 95 theses as an attempt to wipe off the dust, to provide the overall picture, doing justice to aspects that (maybe) were neglected or (maybe) were wrongly understood in the reformational tradition. However, the audience he has in mind seems to be one that is already familiar with the basic concepts and the thrust of Dooyeweerdian thinking; not an audience that is opposed to reformational philosophical thinking, but one that might be helped by a succinct summary in order to encourage further study and discussion. 
601 |a Dooyeweerd, Herman 
601 |a Friesen 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Philosophia reformata  |d Leiden : Brill, 1936  |g 74(2009), 2, Seite 129-141  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618327223  |w (DE-600)2537669-X  |w (DE-576)354444204  |x 2352-8230  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:74  |g year:2009  |g number:2  |g pages:129-141 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/GLAIDA.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000468  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2977113096 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562255436 
LOK |0 005 20170808151721 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw