THE TRANSCENDENTAL CRITIQUE REVISITED AND REVISED
Dooyeweerd’s account of abstraction is examined and found to be faulty. He holds that abstract thinking isolates aspects which must then be synthesized, whereas I argue that we cannot isolate any aspect from the others however so hard we try. But our very inability to isolate aspects is then turned...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2009
|
| In: |
Philosophia reformata
Year: 2009, Volume: 74, Issue: 1, Pages: 21-47 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1562194151 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604142550.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22116117-90000457 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1562194151 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)492194157 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ492194157 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Clouser, Roy |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a THE TRANSCENDENTAL CRITIQUE REVISITED AND REVISED |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Dooyeweerd’s account of abstraction is examined and found to be faulty. He holds that abstract thinking isolates aspects which must then be synthesized, whereas I argue that we cannot isolate any aspect from the others however so hard we try. But our very inability to isolate aspects is then turned into an alternative version of a transcendental critique of theory making. Instead of asking for a basis for synthesizing aspects we have isolated, the new version asks: what is the nature of the aspectual connectedness which is so strong that it cannot be interrupted even by abstraction? I argue that it is impossible for anyone to understand the meaning of a concept fully without taking a position on this issue, whether that is done implicitly or explicitly. Moreover, every answer to this question presupposes a divinity belief. Hence, this recasting of the critique yields a demonstration of the religious regulation of all concepts and every theory. In this way the goal of Dooyeweerd’s critique is achieved, even if not in the way he envisioned. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Philosophia reformata |d Leiden : Brill, 1936 |g 74(2009), 1, Seite 21-47 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)618327223 |w (DE-600)2537669-X |w (DE-576)354444204 |x 2352-8230 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:74 |g year:2009 |g number:1 |g pages:21-47 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1646848470 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000457 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 74 |j 2009 |e 1 |h 21-47 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2977051473 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1562194151 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808151529 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||