Erasmus Birthday Lecture 2015

Erasmus’ famous elusiveness can be linked to a marked preference for media and genres that allowed for a persona, a mask, behind which the ‘real’ Erasmus could disappear at will. This article seeks to identify the literary, rhetorical and above all dialectical patterns Erasmus made use of in order t...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Traninger, Anita 1969- (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Brill 2017
In: Erasmus studies
Year: 2017, 卷: 37, 發布: 1, Pages: 5-22
IxTheo Classification:CD Christianity and Culture
KAG Church history 1500-1648; Reformation; humanism; Renaissance
Further subjects:B Rhetoric dialectics disputation declamation satire 人格面具
在線閱讀: Volltext (Verlag)
實物特徵
總結:Erasmus’ famous elusiveness can be linked to a marked preference for media and genres that allowed for a persona, a mask, behind which the ‘real’ Erasmus could disappear at will. This article seeks to identify the literary, rhetorical and above all dialectical patterns Erasmus made use of in order to separate man and argument and to distance speaker and enunciation. This does not only refer to Erasmus’ familiarity with satirical and rhetorical devices, but also to his ingenious emulation of debating techniques that were common practice among the schoolmen he attacked so fervently. Erasmus’ famous ambiguity and eel-like quality is, at least in some high-profile cases, owed to his ambition of establishing declamation as an equivalent to scholastic controversial formats. Some of his most famous texts are testimony to the attempt of constructing a debating arena in print.
Contains:In: Erasmus studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18749275-03701007