Separation of Religion and State in Stable Christian Democracies: Fact or Myth?

This study compares separation of religion and state (SRAS) as it is conceived in theory with its realization in practice in 40 stable Christian democracies between 1990 and 2008 based on data from the Religion and State Round 2 dataset. There is no agreement in the literature on how SRAS ought to b...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fox, Jonathan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2012
In: Journal of law, religion and state
Year: 2012, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, Pages: 60-94
Further subjects:B religious legislation liberal democracy religious discrimination minorities Christianity secularism
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562153684
003 DE-627
005 20220604142409.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/221248112X638145  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562153684 
035 |a (DE-576)49215368X 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ49215368X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Fox, Jonathan  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Separation of Religion and State in Stable Christian Democracies: Fact or Myth? 
264 1 |c 2012 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This study compares separation of religion and state (SRAS) as it is conceived in theory with its realization in practice in 40 stable Christian democracies between 1990 and 2008 based on data from the Religion and State Round 2 dataset. There is no agreement in the literature on how SRAS ought to be conceived. Many scholars argue that SRAS is a necessary condition for liberal democracies. The present study examines four models of SRAS found in the literature, and a non-SRAS model that addresses the appropriate role of religion in democracies: secularism-laicism, absolute SRAS, neutral political concern, exclusion of ideals, and acceptable support for religion. The study analyzes three factors: (a) whether the state supports one or some religions more than others; (b) the extent of religious legislation; and (c) restrictions on the religious practices and institutions of religious minorities. The analysis shows that depending on the definition of SRAS used, between zero and eight of the 40 countries practice SRAS. Based on this finding, I conclude that either SRAS is not a necessary condition for liberal democracy or many states commonly considered to be liberal democracies are not. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a religious legislation  |x liberal democracy  |x religious discrimination  |x minorities  |x Christianity  |x secularism 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of law, religion and state  |d Leiden : Brill, 2012  |g 1(2012), 1, Seite 60-94  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)796586713  |w (DE-600)2783973-4  |w (DE-576)414227638  |x 2212-4810  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:2012  |g number:1  |g pages:60-94 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1631712888  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/221248112X638145  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 1  |j 2012  |e 1  |h 60-94 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2977010920 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562153684 
LOK |0 005 20170808151412 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL