The Educational Autonomy of Perfectionist Religious Groups in a Liberal State
This Article draws upon, but reworks, John Rawls’ framework from Political Liberalism to determine the degree of educational autonomy that illiberal perfectionist religious groups ought to enjoy in a liberal state. I start by arguing that Rawls mistakenly concludes that political liberalism flatly c...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2012
|
| In: |
Journal of law, religion and state
Year: 2012, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, Pages: 16-44 |
| Further subjects: | B
Rawls
Political Liberalism
political conception of the person
federalism
perfectionism
education
exit
Kymlicka
Sen
Waldron
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1562106015 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604142203.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/221248112X638154 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1562106015 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)492106010 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ492106010 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rosen, Mark D. |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Educational Autonomy of Perfectionist Religious Groups in a Liberal State |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This Article draws upon, but reworks, John Rawls’ framework from Political Liberalism to determine the degree of educational autonomy that illiberal perfectionist religious groups ought to enjoy in a liberal state. I start by arguing that Rawls mistakenly concludes that political liberalism flatly cannot accommodate Perfectionists, and that his misstep is attributable to two errors: (1) Rawls utilizes an overly restrictive “political conception of the person” in determining who participates in the original position, and (2) Rawls overlooks the possibility of a “federalist” basic political structure that can afford significant political autonomy to different groups within a single country. With these insights, I argue that some, though not all, religious Perfectionists are consistent with a stable liberal polity, and explain why foundational Rawlsian premises require that Perfectionists be accommodated to the extent possible. | ||
| 601 | |a Autonomie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Rawls |x Political Liberalism |x political conception of the person |x federalism |x perfectionism |x education |x exit |x Kymlicka |x Sen |x Waldron | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of law, religion and state |d Leiden : Brill, 2012 |g 1(2012), 1, Seite 16-44 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)796586713 |w (DE-600)2783973-4 |w (DE-576)414227638 |x 2212-4810 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2012 |g number:1 |g pages:16-44 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1631712802 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/221248112X638154 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 1 |j 2012 |e 1 |h 16-44 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976963061 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1562106015 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808151241 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||