Public Reason, Private Virtue, and Political Philosophy: Religious Approaches to the Progressive Income Tax
The use of religious texts in public policy debates has been the cause of significant controversy. Believing Christians, Jews, and others naturally suggest that their faith should play a role in real-world policy discussions. But others suggest that such arguments may be dangerous and, in any event,...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2013
|
Dans: |
Journal of law, religion and state
Année: 2013, Volume: 2, Numéro: 2, Pages: 168-199 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
tax policy
taxation, progressive
religion
law and religion
public reason
|
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
Résumé: | The use of religious texts in public policy debates has been the cause of significant controversy. Believing Christians, Jews, and others naturally suggest that their faith should play a role in real-world policy discussions. But others suggest that such arguments may be dangerous and, in any event, lack persuasive power to those not part of the same religious tradition. The public reason theory, frequently associated with John Rawls, states that religious arguments are permissible only when supported by evidence that would be accessible to those who do not share the same underlying religious beliefs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2212-4810 |
Contient: | In: Journal of law, religion and state
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22124810-00202004 |