DUALITY OR DUALISM: A REPLY TO JOHAN STELLINGWERFF
In Philosophia Reformata, Vol. 69, No. 1, Johan Stellingwerff published a challenging article1 on the need to rethink the philosophy of technology in reformational philosophy. Stellingwerff is not only critical about the work done by Van Riessen and Schuurman, but he also criticizes the Dual Nature...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Brill
2005
|
| In: |
Philosophia reformata
Anno: 2005, Volume: 70, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 64-69 |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Edizione parallela: | Non elettronico
|
| Riepilogo: | In Philosophia Reformata, Vol. 69, No. 1, Johan Stellingwerff published a challenging article1 on the need to rethink the philosophy of technology in reformational philosophy. Stellingwerff is not only critical about the work done by Van Riessen and Schuurman, but he also criticizes the Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts program at the Delft University of Technology.2 In this reply I want to take up particularly some of the points of criticism against the latter and see if they can be upheld when taking a closer look at what has been published in this program so far. Although the article by Stellingwerff is in Dutch, I have decided to write my reply in English to enable a wider audience to take part in the debate. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2352-8230 |
| Comprende: | In: Philosophia reformata
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22116117-90000342 |