Defending the Ignorance View of Sceptical Scenarios

What is the role of sceptical scenarios—dreams, evil demons, brains in a vat—in sceptical arguments? According to the error view, sceptical scenarios illustrate the possibility of massive falsity in one’s beliefs, whereas according to the ignorance view, they illustrate the possibility of massive ig...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kraft, Tim (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2015
In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2015, Volume: 5, Issue: 4, Pages: 269-295
Further subjects:B Cartesian scepticism sceptical scenarios brain in a vat error-possibilities ignorance-possibilities ignorance view epistemic closure kk-principle
Online Access: Volltext (Publisher)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1562052225
003 DE-627
005 20220604141944.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22105700-04010001  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562052225 
035 |a (DE-576)492052220 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ492052220 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kraft, Tim  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Defending the Ignorance View of Sceptical Scenarios 
264 1 |c 2015 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a What is the role of sceptical scenarios—dreams, evil demons, brains in a vat—in sceptical arguments? According to the error view, sceptical scenarios illustrate the possibility of massive falsity in one’s beliefs, whereas according to the ignorance view, they illustrate the possibility of massive ignorance not necessarily due to falsity. In this paper, the ignorance view is defended by surveying the arguments in favour of it and by replying to two pressing objections against it. According to the first objection, the ignorance view illicitly introduces the kk-principle into sceptical arguments. In reply I argue that kk is not less plausible than its main rival, the closure principle. According to the second objection, relying on veridical ignorance-possibilities contradicts the transparency of belief. In reply I introduce a version of transparency that is consistent with the ignorance view. 
650 4 |a Cartesian scepticism  |x sceptical scenarios  |x brain in a vat  |x error-possibilities  |x ignorance-possibilities  |x ignorance view  |x epistemic closure  |x kk-principle 
773 0 8 |i In  |t International journal for the study of skepticism  |d Leiden : Brill, 2011  |g 5(2015), 4, Seite 269-295  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)660812843  |w (DE-600)2610085-X  |w (DE-576)345005341  |x 2210-5700  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2015  |g number:4  |g pages:269-295 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105700-04010001  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976909016 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562052225 
LOK |0 005 20170808151051 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL