Fallible Authority
Old Catholic theologians have often underlined the relationship between papal supremacy and infallibility and the priority of the former: the pope has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, therefore he must be obeyed; but at the same time, he may be obeyed, because he will not mi...
Published in: | Ecclesiology |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2017
|
In: |
Ecclesiology
|
IxTheo Classification: | KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KCB Papacy KCC Councils KDB Roman Catholic Church RB Church office; congregation |
Further subjects: | B
Authority
Papacy
Infallibility
Vatican i
Old Catholic Church
|
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | Old Catholic theologians have often underlined the relationship between papal supremacy and infallibility and the priority of the former: the pope has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, therefore he must be obeyed; but at the same time, he may be obeyed, because he will not mislead the Church due to his infallibility. This article analyses this relationship, applying differentiations on two axes: on the one hand, Bocheński’s typology of epistemic and deontic authority; on the other hand, the notions of personal, formal and constitutional authority. The fact that the infallibility dogma of Vatican i considers papal authority at the same time as epistemic and constitutional authority, is identified as a major weakness of the dogma. The article will then approach the question how church leaders should practise their deontic authority in a context where their (and everybody else’s) epistemic authority is considered to be fallible. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5316 |
Contains: | In: Ecclesiology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455316-01302003 |