Searching for Non-Toxic Religion
This article provides more accurate tools to engage the public nature of religious and other ideological claims by proposing a distinction between belief-policies, beliefs and practices that could enable more acute ways of locating the aspects of ideology that are considered problematic in a given s...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 电子 文件 |
| 语言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 载入...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| 出版: |
2011
|
| In: |
International journal of public theology
Year: 2011, 卷: 5, 发布: 4, Pages: 476-487 |
| Further subjects: | B
Religion And Public Life
tolerance
Daniel Dennett
dogmatism
|
| 在线阅读: |
Volltext (Publisher) |
| 总结: | This article provides more accurate tools to engage the public nature of religious and other ideological claims by proposing a distinction between belief-policies, beliefs and practices that could enable more acute ways of locating the aspects of ideology that are considered problematic in a given situation. In addition, the article proposes rules of engagement for how we might deal with these aspects in public discourse. |
|---|---|
| 实物描述: | Online-Ressource |
| ISSN: | 1569-7320 |
| Contains: | In: International journal of public theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/156973211X595952 |
