A RESPONSE TO ROY CLOUSER’S ARISTOTELIAN INTERPRETATION OF DOOYEWEERD
Roy Clouser has recently compared the philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd and Aristotle. He finds their ontology to be “strikingly similar” except that Dooyeweerd has a different “divinity belief” concerning the Origin or Archè of the cosmos (Clouser 2009, 22 fn.17, 23, 28, and 45). This common ontolo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2010
|
| In: |
Philosophia reformata
Year: 2010, Volume: 75, Issue: 2, Pages: 97-116 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1561929980 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604141433.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22116117-90000491 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1561929980 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)491929986 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ491929986 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)111838413X |0 (DE-627)871940086 |0 (DE-576)479443750 |4 aut |a Friesen, J. Glenn | |
| 109 | |a Friesen, J. Glenn | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A RESPONSE TO ROY CLOUSER’S ARISTOTELIAN INTERPRETATION OF DOOYEWEERD |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Roy Clouser has recently compared the philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd and Aristotle. He finds their ontology to be “strikingly similar” except that Dooyeweerd has a different “divinity belief” concerning the Origin or Archè of the cosmos (Clouser 2009, 22 fn.17, 23, 28, and 45). This common ontology involves the abstraction of properties and laws from concrete things and events. A property can be referred to using predicate logic, in the form “x is y.” For example, “x is heavy.” Or “x is red.” Abstraction isolates that property or predicate from the thing or event that “exhibits” the property (Clouser 2009, 36). | ||
| 601 | |a Interpretation | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Philosophia reformata |d Leiden : Brill, 1936 |g 75(2010), 2, Seite 97-116 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)618327223 |w (DE-600)2537669-X |w (DE-576)354444204 |x 2352-8230 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:75 |g year:2010 |g number:2 |g pages:97-116 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000491 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976786291 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1561929980 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808150623 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||