The Judgement on Athanasius in the Historiography of Christian Dogma (Mosheim-Baur-Harnack)
The present article studies the attitude of three prominent historiographers of Christian dogma towards Athanasius, viz., Johann Lorenz von Mosheim (1693–1755), Ferdinand Christian Baur (1792–1860), and Adolf von Harnack (1851–1930). Their different theological backgrounds resulted in different judg...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2010
|
In: |
Church history and religious culture
Year: 2010, Volume: 90, Issue: 2/3, Pages: 277-286 |
Further subjects: | B
Protestant Theology
Athanasius
Reception
Historiography
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1561898945 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220604141316.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 170808s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/18712411-0X542400 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1561898945 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)491898940 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ491898940 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Meijering, Eginhard |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Judgement on Athanasius in the Historiography of Christian Dogma (Mosheim-Baur-Harnack) |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The present article studies the attitude of three prominent historiographers of Christian dogma towards Athanasius, viz., Johann Lorenz von Mosheim (1693–1755), Ferdinand Christian Baur (1792–1860), and Adolf von Harnack (1851–1930). Their different theological backgrounds resulted in different judgements on his expositions on the Trinity. Mosheim’s evaluation of Athanasius is positive, but he thinks Athanasius speculates too much about the mystery of the Trinity, which cannot be understood by reason. Baur considers his theology to reflect a crucial moment within the development of Christian thought, a moment that shows the internal dynamics of this development. Harnack is of the opinion that Christians owe it to Athanasius that Christian faith did not end up as moralism and cosmology. He also thinks that in Athanasius’views on Christ we can hardly find anything of the Jesus of the gospels. | ||
601 | |a Athanasius | ||
650 | 4 | |a Protestant Theology |x Athanasius |x Reception |x Historiography | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Church history and religious culture |d Leiden : Brill, 2006 |g 90(2010), 2/3, Seite 277-286 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)521455545 |w (DE-600)2260084-X |w (DE-576)271497904 |x 1871-2428 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:90 |g year:2010 |g number:2/3 |g pages:277-286 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1646114094 |k Electronic | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18712411-0X542400 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2976754926 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1561898945 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20170808150521 | ||
LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |