In Conversation with the Skeptic: Contextualism and the Raising of Standards
I begin by describing the solution to the problem of skepticism propounded by contextualists, which constitutes the background of the rest of the paper. I then address the question of what happens when a skeptic and a non-skeptic are confronted in dialogue to the standards in play for correct knowle...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2013
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2013, Volume: 3, Issue: 2, Pages: 97-118 |
| Further subjects: | B
Skepticism
contextualism
Keith DeRose
rule of attention
factivity problem
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1561880817 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604141227.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/221057012X630704 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1561880817 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)491880812 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ491880812 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sgaravatti, Daniele |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a In Conversation with the Skeptic: Contextualism and the Raising of Standards |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a I begin by describing the solution to the problem of skepticism propounded by contextualists, which constitutes the background of the rest of the paper. I then address the question of what happens when a skeptic and a non-skeptic are confronted in dialogue to the standards in play for correct knowledge ascription, on the assumption that contextualism about knowledge is right. I argue against Keith DeRose that there are reasons, both intuitive and theoretical, to conclude that the standards will be raised in such a way as to make the skeptic’s denials of knowledge true. Next, I argue, again against DeRose, for the claim that that conclusion has significant theoretical consequences. In particular, I argue that, if the standards do tend to rise, then there is a serious problem for contextualist answers to skepticism. The problem, which is sometimes called the factivity problem, is that the contextualist position is not possible to state properly unless we know in the theoretical context that skeptical hypotheses do not hold. | ||
| 601 | |a Conversano | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Skepticism |x contextualism |x Keith DeRose |x rule of attention |x factivity problem | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 3(2013), 2, Seite 97-118 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2013 |g number:2 |g pages:97-118 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/221057012X630704 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976736499 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1561880817 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808150444 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||