The parent analogy: a reassessment

According to the parent analogy, as a caretaker's goodness, ability and intelligence increase, the likelihood that the caretaker will make arrangements for the attainment of future goods that are unnoticed or underappreciated by their dependents also increases. Consequently, if this analogy acc...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Rutledge, Jonathan (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: [2017]
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Anno: 2017, Volume: 82, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 5-14
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Dougherty, Trent 1971- / Teismo / Scetticismo / Essere umano / Dio / Analogia / Genitori / Bambino
Altre parole chiave:B Evil
B Dougherty
B Skeptical theism
B Wykstra
B Parent analogy
Accesso online: Accesso probabilmente gratuito
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:According to the parent analogy, as a caretaker's goodness, ability and intelligence increase, the likelihood that the caretaker will make arrangements for the attainment of future goods that are unnoticed or underappreciated by their dependents also increases. Consequently, if this analogy accurately represents our relationship to God, then we should expect to find many instances of inscrutable evil in the world. This argument in support of skeptical theism has recently been criticized by Dougherty. I argue that Dougherty's argument is incomplete, for there are two plausible ways of construing the parent analogy's conclusion. I supplement Dougherty's case by offering a new argument against the parent analogy based on failed expectations concerning the amount of inscrutable evils encountered in the world. Consequently, there remains a significant empirical hurdle for skeptical theism to overcome if it is to maintain its status as a defeater for our reliability when tracking gratuitous evils.
ISSN:1572-8684
Comprende:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-016-9588-8