La (re)construction des identités religieuses / spirituelles anglicanes: Une étude comparative des contributions théoriques de Peter L. Berger et Pierre Bourdieu1
Ongoing developments in the Anglican Communion, most notably the unfolding controversy over “homosexuality,” serve as an excellent case study for the application of Peter L. Berger’s and Pierre Bourdieu’s distinctive sociological approaches to the study of religious/spiritual identity construction/r...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | French |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
[2016]
|
In: |
Studies in religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 45, Issue: 1, Pages: 43-62 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 156092876X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180731103503.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 170717s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||fre c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0008429815622750 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)156092876X | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)490928765 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ490928765 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a fre | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lieflander, Riva |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 3 | |a La (re)construction des identités religieuses / spirituelles anglicanes |b Une étude comparative des contributions théoriques de Peter L. Berger et Pierre Bourdieu1 |c Riva Lieflander |
264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Ongoing developments in the Anglican Communion, most notably the unfolding controversy over “homosexuality,” serve as an excellent case study for the application of Peter L. Berger’s and Pierre Bourdieu’s distinctive sociological approaches to the study of religious/spiritual identity construction/reconstruction. As this case study demonstrates, Berger’s dialectically ordered “holy trinity” of externalization, objectivization, and internalization focuses primarily on social interactions, but largely ignores both power inequalities between individuals as well as the multi-layered context of social reality production/coproduction. Bourdieu’s dialectically ordered “holy trinity” of habitus, field, and capital also examines the process of social reality production/coproduction. By contrast, however, it does address sources of (unequally distributed) power between individuals and groups, and is adaptable to a more highly complexified multi-level social interactional scenario, but it tends to “crystallize” power, thereby obfuscating its socially mediated conditionality. A fuller analysis of religious pluralism requires a dialectically ordered theoretical approach which encompasses both dynamic social interactions, as well as the formation (and dissolution) of power sources within these interactions. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Studies in religion |d London : Sage, 1971 |g 45(2016), 1, Seite 43-62 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)617810826 |w (DE-600)2535808-X |w (DE-576)318518368 |x 2042-0587 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:43-62 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0008429815622750 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2974374646 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 156092876X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20170717174844 | ||
LOK | |0 008 170717||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |