Response
This essay responds to the previous essays by McCutcheon, Larsson, and Jensen. It argues that, while the textbook genre is a conservative one and has a tendency to reify religion, it is important to try to move beyond such conservatism and reifications.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2017]
|
In: |
Culture and religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 49-56 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hughes, Aaron W. 1968-, Muslim identities
|
IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion BJ Islam |
Further subjects: | B
Islam
B Religion B Criticism B theory and method |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | This essay responds to the previous essays by McCutcheon, Larsson, and Jensen. It argues that, while the textbook genre is a conservative one and has a tendency to reify religion, it is important to try to move beyond such conservatism and reifications. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-5610 |
Reference: | Kritik von "Apologising for the study of religion - no way! (2017)"
Kritik von "Disharmony is my business and business is good - a typical day at the office of a historian of religions (2017)" Kritik von "Identifying the meaning and end of scholarship (2017)" |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Culture and religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14755610.2017.1301970 |