Henry Nelson Wieman on Religion and Reinhold Niebuhr
Henry Nelson Wieman and Reinhold Niebuhr were theologically poles apart—Wieman a “new naturalist” and Niebuhr a “new super naturalist”—according to Wieman's nomenclature. Wieman devoted more time and attention to Niebuhr than Niebuhr did to him. The reason for this was the result of Wieman'...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
[2017]
|
| En: |
Zygon
Año: 2017, Volumen: 52, Número: 2, Páginas: 323-342 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Niebuhr, Reinhold 1892-1971
/ Naturalismo (Filosofía)
/ Wieman, Henry Nelson 1884-1975
/ Supranaturalismo
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AB Filosofía de la religión |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Religión
B Henry Nelson Wieman B Reinhold Niebuhr |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Sumario: | Henry Nelson Wieman and Reinhold Niebuhr were theologically poles apart—Wieman a “new naturalist” and Niebuhr a “new super naturalist”—according to Wieman's nomenclature. Wieman devoted more time and attention to Niebuhr than Niebuhr did to him. The reason for this was the result of Wieman's sustained attack on the “new supernaturalism” with which he identified Niebuhr as one of the major American representatives. This article traces the background to Wieman's view of Niebuhr—Wieman's own views on science, on religion, and on Christianity—then proceeds to Wieman's analysis of Niebuhr's theology and his relation to the “new supernaturalism,” concluding with Niebuhr's reply to Wieman. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12333 |
