Intertextuality in New Testament Scholarship: Significance, Criteria, and the Art of Intertextual Reading

‘Intertextuality’ is currently a hot topic among biblical interpreters. However, a great deal of debate regarding the locus, purpose, and meaning-effect of an intertextual event, the criteria used to discern the presence of intertexts (if in fact there are any), and the theological value of intertex...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Emadi, Samuel (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Sage [2015]
In: Currents in biblical research
Anno: 2015, Volume: 14, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 8-23
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Intertextuality / Bible / Hermeneutics / Citation / Allusion / Old Testament / New Testament
Notazioni IxTheo:HA Bibbia
KAJ Età contemporanea
Altre parole chiave:B inner-biblical interpretation
B Bible. New Testament
B echo
B Leroy Huizenga
B Bible Criticism, interpretation, etc
B New Testament use of the Old Testament
B Christopher Beetham
B Intertextuality
B Allusion
B Michael Thompson
B Richard Hays
B Greg Beale
B Peter Leithart
B Hermeneutics
B Dale Allison
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Edizione parallela:Elettronico
Descrizione
Riepilogo:‘Intertextuality’ is currently a hot topic among biblical interpreters. However, a great deal of debate regarding the locus, purpose, and meaning-effect of an intertextual event, the criteria used to discern the presence of intertexts (if in fact there are any), and the theological value of intertextuality in Scripture still exists. This article surveys these interpretive questions and discusses how the foremost contributors to the conversation have aimed at resolving these hermeneutical tensions. In this article, I examine and compare the hermeneutical methodologies of Richard Hays, Michael Thompson, Dale Allison, Greg Beale, Christopher Beetham, Leroy Huizenga, and Peter Leithart with respect to intertextuality. My aim is to identify the strengths of each contributor’s hermeneutical method, while clarifying where these scholars share similar hermeneutical convictions, as well as where they part ways with one another’s convictions about the practice of intertextual reading.
ISSN:1745-5200
Comprende:Enthalten in: Currents in biblical research
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/1476993X14532747