Robust moral realism: an excellent religion

According to robust moral realism, there exist objective, non-natural moral facts. Moral facts of this sort do not fit easily into the world as illuminated by natural science. Further, if such facts exist at all, it is hard to see how we could know of their existence by any familiar means. Yet robus...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Killoren, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V [2016]
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 79, Issue: 3, Pages: 223-237
Further subjects:B Phenomenal Conservatism
B Ethics
B Moral Realism
B Atheism
B Phenomenalism
B EVIDENTIALISM
B Faith
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1559350938
003 DE-627
005 20221110132822.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170601s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-015-9509-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1559350938 
035 |a (DE-576)489350933 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ489350933 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1128233797  |0 (DE-627)882666975  |0 (DE-576)485752549  |4 aut  |a Killoren, David 
109 |a Killoren, David 
245 1 0 |a Robust moral realism  |b an excellent religion  |c David Killoren 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to robust moral realism, there exist objective, non-natural moral facts. Moral facts of this sort do not fit easily into the world as illuminated by natural science. Further, if such facts exist at all, it is hard to see how we could know of their existence by any familiar means. Yet robust realists are not moral skeptics; they believe that we do know (some of) the moral facts. Thus robust moral realism comes with a number of hard-to-defend ontological and epistemological commitments. Recently, Sharon Street has claimed, in light of these commitments, that robust moral realism requires a kind of faith and 'has become a strange form of religion.' I believe that Street is right. I argue at some length that robust moral realism does require faith, and is a religion. However, I further argue that it is an excellent religion. I argue that it has three principal advantages: it is avoids wishful thinking, is guaranteed not to contradict the results of natural science, and is profoundly simple in its ontological commitments. Further, robust moral realism may be rationally defensible on evidentialist grounds. Consequently, even if the standard arguments for traditional religions are not compelling, there might still be compelling arguments for robust moral realism. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Atheism 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a EVIDENTIALISM 
650 4 |a Faith 
650 4 |a Moral Realism 
650 4 |a Phenomenal Conservatism 
650 4 |a Phenomenalism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 79(2016), 3, Seite 223-237  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:79  |g year:2016  |g number:3  |g pages:223-237 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-015-9509-2  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2970848570 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1559350938 
LOK |0 005 20170601153945 
LOK |0 008 170601||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL