Escaping hell but not heaven
Benjamin Matheson (Int J Philos Relig 75:197-206, ) has recently critiqued the escapist account of hell that we have defended. In this paper we respond to Matheson. Building on some of our work in defense of escapism that Matheson does not discuss (in particular, Buckareff and Plug, The problem of h...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Altri autori: | |
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
2015
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Anno: 2015, Volume: 77, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 247-253 |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Retribution
Religious aspects
B Heaven B Afterlife B Future Life B God Omniscience B MATHESON, Benjamin B Hell |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1559176377 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230125165927.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170531s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-014-9490-1 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1559176377 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)489176372 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ489176372 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1049182839 |0 (DE-627)781301106 |0 (DE-576)403132053 |4 aut |a Buckareff, Andrei A. |d 1971- | |
| 109 | |a Buckareff, Andrei A. 1971- |a Buckareff, Andrei 1971- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Escaping hell but not heaven |c Andrei Buckareff |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Benjamin Matheson (Int J Philos Relig 75:197-206, ) has recently critiqued the escapist account of hell that we have defended. In this paper we respond to Matheson. Building on some of our work in defense of escapism that Matheson does not discuss (in particular, Buckareff and Plug, The problem of hell: a philosophical anthology, Ashgate, Burlington, ) we show that the threat posed by Matheson's critique is chimerical. We begin by summarizing our escapist theory of hell. Next, we summarize both Matheson's central thesis and the main arguments offered in its defense. We then respond to those arguments. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Afterlife | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Future Life | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God |x Omniscience | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Heaven | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hell | |
| 650 | 4 | |a MATHESON, Benjamin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Retribution |x Religious aspects | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Plug, Allen |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 77(2015), 3, Seite 247-253 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:77 |g year:2015 |g number:3 |g pages:247-253 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9490-1 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2970529432 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1559176377 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170531122911 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170531||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
