Ivan Karamazov is a hopeless romantic

Ivan Karamazov is frequently used, and misused, in discussions concerning the problem of evil. The purpose of this article is to correct some pervasive misinterpretations of Ivan's statement, as found in Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov. I criticise some common misinterpretations, as ex...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
发表在:International journal for philosophy of religion
主要作者: Betenson, Toby (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2015
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2015, 卷: 77, 发布: 1, Pages: 65-73
Further subjects:B GOOD & evil
B KARAMAZOV, Ivan (Fictitious character)
B Research
B Romantic
B John Hick
B Marilyn Adams
B Positivism
B BROTHERS Karamazov, The (Book : Dostoyevsky)
B Dostoevsky
B Romanticism
B Theodicy
B Positivist
B Ivan Karamazov
B Stewart Sutherland
B The problem of evil
在线阅读: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
实物特征
总结:Ivan Karamazov is frequently used, and misused, in discussions concerning the problem of evil. The purpose of this article is to correct some pervasive misinterpretations of Ivan's statement, as found in Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov. I criticise some common misinterpretations, as exemplified in the theodical work of Marilyn Adams and John Hick, as well as the more nuanced interpretation of Stewart Sutherland. Though Sutherland's interpretation is the strongest, it nevertheless misses the mark in identifying Ivan as a positivist. I argue that Ivan Karamazov is not a positivist, but a romantic, and a hopeless one at that. We should, therefore, not read Ivan as stating an argument for the non-existence of God, but instead see him as a representative of a very particular and robust form of non-cognitive atheism.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contains:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-014-9487-9