Being as Iconic: Aquinas on ‘He Who Is’ as the Name for God
Aquinas claims that ‘He Who Is’ is the most proper of the names we have for God. But this attempt to ‘describe’ God with a philosophical concept like ‘being’ can seem dangerously close to creating a false conception based on our limited understanding - an idol. A dominant criticism of Aquinas’ use o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
| In: |
International journal of systematic theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 19, Issue: 2, Pages: 163-174 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages KDB Roman Catholic Church NBC Doctrine of God VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1556113323 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20170330162700.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170330s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/ijst.12212 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1556113323 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)486113329 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ486113329 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1042549907 |0 (DE-627)769103456 |0 (DE-576)394026683 |4 aut |a Rooney, James Dominic | |
| 109 | |a Rooney, James Dominic |a Rooney, Alan Christian |a Ni Jia Daoming | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Being as Iconic |b Aquinas on ‘He Who Is’ as the Name for God |c James Dominic Rooney |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Aquinas claims that ‘He Who Is’ is the most proper of the names we have for God. But this attempt to ‘describe’ God with a philosophical concept like ‘being’ can seem dangerously close to creating a false conception based on our limited understanding - an idol. A dominant criticism of Aquinas’ use of this term is that any attempt to use ‘being’ to describe God will inevitably make him merely some object in our ontology alongside other beings, unacceptably mitigating God's radical transcendence and otherness. I will argue that Aquinas has a very creative response to this charge: ‘being’ stands in a unique relationship as the only concept that can ensure we do not draw God under some particular creaturely limit and thus use divine names to create an ‘idol’. In other words, ‘being’ is a special paradigm concept/term which ensures that we preserve humility in our attempts to name God. | ||
| 652 | |a KAE:KDB:NBC:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of systematic theology |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1999 |g 19(2017), 2, Seite 163-174 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)324484879 |w (DE-600)2027148-7 |w (DE-576)094641951 |x 1468-2400 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:163-174 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijst.12212/abstract |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/ijst.12212 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2963170815 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1556113323 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180830155836 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170330||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049839 |a KDB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044462 |a KAE | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||