Assumption, Union and Sanctification: Some Clarifying Distinctions
In this article I engage with the notion that Christ ought to be understood to have a fallen human nature because Christ sanctifies human nature, and it is fallen humanity that needs sanctifying. In opposition to this line of thought, I argue that the Son of God assumed an unfallen nature, but with...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
| In: |
International journal of systematic theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Pages: 53-72 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NBE Anthropology NBF Christology NBK Soteriology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1556111045 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20170330153637.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170330s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/ijst.12192 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1556111045 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)486111040 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ486111040 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1052903304 |0 (DE-627)789278863 |0 (DE-576)408643811 |4 aut |a King, Rolfe | |
| 109 | |a King, Rolfe | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assumption, Union and Sanctification |b Some Clarifying Distinctions |c Rolfe King |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this article I engage with the notion that Christ ought to be understood to have a fallen human nature because Christ sanctifies human nature, and it is fallen humanity that needs sanctifying. In opposition to this line of thought, I argue that the Son of God assumed an unfallen nature, but with the powers of fallenness operative within it, and that this notion is consistent with a distinct account of sanctification. In support of these claims, I develop distinctions between a conjoining union and a transferring union, and between the Chalcedonian union at the incarnation and the extension of that union on the cross. At the assumption a conjoining union occurred, not a transferring union. Christ sanctified his own nature, prior to a transferring union. | ||
| 652 | |a NBE:NBF:NBK | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of systematic theology |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1999 |g 19(2017), 1, Seite 53-72 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)324484879 |w (DE-600)2027148-7 |w (DE-576)094641951 |x 1468-2400 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:53-72 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijst.12192/abstract |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/ijst.12192 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2963166710 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1556111045 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180830154900 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170330||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051787 |a NBF | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052325 |a NBK | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||