Assumption, Union and Sanctification: Some Clarifying Distinctions
In this article I engage with the notion that Christ ought to be understood to have a fallen human nature because Christ sanctifies human nature, and it is fallen humanity that needs sanctifying. In opposition to this line of thought, I argue that the Son of God assumed an unfallen nature, but with...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
In: |
International journal of systematic theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Pages: 53-72 |
IxTheo Classification: | NBE Anthropology NBF Christology NBK Soteriology |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1556111045 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20170330153637.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 170330s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/ijst.12192 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1556111045 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)486111040 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ486111040 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1052903304 |0 (DE-627)789278863 |0 (DE-576)408643811 |4 aut |a King, Rolfe | |
109 | |a King, Rolfe | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assumption, Union and Sanctification |b Some Clarifying Distinctions |c Rolfe King |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this article I engage with the notion that Christ ought to be understood to have a fallen human nature because Christ sanctifies human nature, and it is fallen humanity that needs sanctifying. In opposition to this line of thought, I argue that the Son of God assumed an unfallen nature, but with the powers of fallenness operative within it, and that this notion is consistent with a distinct account of sanctification. In support of these claims, I develop distinctions between a conjoining union and a transferring union, and between the Chalcedonian union at the incarnation and the extension of that union on the cross. At the assumption a conjoining union occurred, not a transferring union. Christ sanctified his own nature, prior to a transferring union. | ||
652 | |a NBE:NBF:NBK | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of systematic theology |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1999 |g 19(2017), 1, Seite 53-72 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)324484879 |w (DE-600)2027148-7 |w (DE-576)094641951 |x 1468-2400 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:53-72 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijst.12192/abstract |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/ijst.12192 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2963166710 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1556111045 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180830154900 | ||
LOK | |0 008 170330||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051787 |a NBF | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052325 |a NBK | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |