The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature
This article examines appearances of the mark of the beast or beast in the early Pentecostal Literature from 1908–1918. By utilizing Wirkungsgeschichte, this article demonstrates that early Pentecostal interpretations were not monolithic when interpreting bestial texts. Dispensationalism did not con...
| Опубликовано в: : | Journal of pentecostal theology |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
2016
|
| В: |
Journal of pentecostal theology
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | CG Христианство и политика KAJ Новейшее время KDG Свободная церковь NBQ Эсхатология |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
mark of the beast
Dispensationalism
Revelation 13
Apocalypse
history of effect
reception history
early Pentecostalism
|
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Итог: | This article examines appearances of the mark of the beast or beast in the early Pentecostal Literature from 1908–1918. By utilizing Wirkungsgeschichte, this article demonstrates that early Pentecostal interpretations were not monolithic when interpreting bestial texts. Dispensationalism did not control their interpretations. The Apocalypse had a significant impact on early Pentecostal reflection including their criticism of issues associated with World War i. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5251 |
| Второстепенные работы: | In: Journal of pentecostal theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455251-02502003 |