The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature
This article examines appearances of the mark of the beast or beast in the early Pentecostal Literature from 1908–1918. By utilizing Wirkungsgeschichte, this article demonstrates that early Pentecostal interpretations were not monolithic when interpreting bestial texts. Dispensationalism did not con...
| Publié dans: | Journal of pentecostal theology |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2016
|
| Dans: |
Journal of pentecostal theology
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | CG Christianisme et politique KAJ Époque contemporaine KDG Église libre NBQ Eschatologie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
mark of the beast
Dispensationalism
Revelation 13
Apocalypse
history of effect
reception history
early Pentecostalism
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This article examines appearances of the mark of the beast or beast in the early Pentecostal Literature from 1908–1918. By utilizing Wirkungsgeschichte, this article demonstrates that early Pentecostal interpretations were not monolithic when interpreting bestial texts. Dispensationalism did not control their interpretations. The Apocalypse had a significant impact on early Pentecostal reflection including their criticism of issues associated with World War i. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5251 |
| Contient: | In: Journal of pentecostal theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455251-02502003 |