Justified religious difference: a constructive approach to religious diversity
In this paper, I provide a novel approach to the issue of religious diversity: I reject classical pluralist approaches to the issue, such as John Hick’s, and argue that their attempts to construe commonalities between the religions are contrived. The reason that they attempt to find commonalities at...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2016]
|
| In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 76, Issue: 5, Pages: 419-427 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religious pluralism
/ Interfaith dialogue
/ Bi-valence
/ Religion
/ Difference
/ Justification (Philosophy)
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AX Inter-religious relations |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1544980833 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200226131051.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160719s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/21692327.2015.1166682 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1544980833 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)474980839 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ474980839 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)102668059X |0 (DE-627)727053574 |0 (DE-576)180700812 |4 aut |a Grube, Dirk-Martin |d 1959- | |
| 109 | |a Grube, Dirk-Martin 1959- |a Grube, Dirk M. 1959- |a Grube, Dirk Martin 1959- |a Grube, Dirk 1959- |a Grube, Dirk-M. 1959- |a Grube, D. M. 1959- |a Grube, D.-M. 1959- |a Grube, D. 1959- |a Grube, D.M.K.H. 1959- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Justified religious difference |b a constructive approach to religious diversity |c Dirk-Martin Grube, Faculty of Theology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper, I provide a novel approach to the issue of religious diversity: I reject classical pluralist approaches to the issue, such as John Hick’s, and argue that their attempts to construe commonalities between the religions are contrived. The reason that they attempt to find commonalities at all costs is that they presuppose a bivalent notion of truth according to which that which is different is false. I suggest that, in order to get a robust theory on religious diversity off the ground, we should rely on the notion of justification rather than that of bivalent truth. Justification is pluralizable, dependent upon the (epistemic) circumstances, whereas bivalent truth is not. Armed with a pluralizable notion of justification, we can acknowledge that other religious beliefs are genuinely different without necessarily being false: They can be justified, given the (epistemic) circumstances a believer of a different religion is in. Perceiving religious differences in this way allows to liberate the interreligious dialogue from the pressure to find commonalities between religions at all costs, to respect the religious Other in her Otherness, and to "mirror" one’s own religion in light of other religions. | ||
| 652 | |a AB:AX | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4296178-6 |0 (DE-627)104164549 |0 (DE-576)210985100 |2 gnd |a Religiöser Pluralismus |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4192352-2 |0 (DE-627)105235164 |0 (DE-576)210079924 |2 gnd |a Interreligiöser Dialog |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)1112753966 |0 (DE-627)86690056X |0 (DE-576)476751063 |2 gnd |a Bivalenz |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049396-9 |0 (DE-627)106187155 |0 (DE-576)209081880 |2 gnd |a Religion |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4132482-1 |0 (DE-627)105687405 |0 (DE-576)209635940 |2 gnd |a Unterschied |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4138650-4 |0 (DE-627)10564109X |0 (DE-576)209687851 |2 gnd |a Rechtfertigung |g Philosophie |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of philosophy and theology |d Abingdon : Taylor & Francis, 2013 |g 76(2015), 5, Seite 419-427 |w (DE-627)731333977 |w (DE-600)2692944-2 |w (DE-576)381569306 |x 2169-2327 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:76 |g year:2015 |g number:5 |g pages:419-427 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Woudenberg, René van, 1957 - |t An epistemic argument for tolerance |d 2016 |w (DE-627)1544981597 |w (DE-576)474981592 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Brümmer, Vincent, 1932 - 2021 |t Grube on justified religious difference |d 2016 |w (DE-627)1544981813 |w (DE-576)474981819 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Pihlström, Sami, 1969 - |t Response to Dirk-Martin Grube |d 2016 |w (DE-627)154498202X |w (DE-576)474982025 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Jonkers, Peter, 1954 - |t What about unjustified religious difference? |d 2016 |w (DE-627)1544982224 |w (DE-576)47498222X |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Brom, Luco Johan van den, 1946 - |t A theological alternative to Grube’s notion of "Justified religious difference" |d 2016 |w (DE-627)1544982372 |w (DE-576)474982378 |
| 856 | |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21692327.2015.1166682?needAccess=true |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2015.1166682 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 76 |j 2015 |e 5 |h 419-427 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2933685221 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1544980833 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20160826122902 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160719||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043253 |a AX | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Bi-valence,Difference,Interfaith dialogue,Interreligious relations,Interreligious dialog,Interreligious encounter,Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature,Religious pluralism,Religion,Pluralism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Bivalence,Dialogue interreligieux,Dialogue interreligieux,Différence,Pluralisme religieux,Religion,Religions,Religion |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Bivalencia,Diferencia,Diálogo interreligioso,Diálogo inter-religioso,Pluralismo religioso,Religión,Religión,Religión |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Bivalenza,Dialogo interreligioso,Dialogo interreligioso,Differenza,Pluralismo religioso,Religione,Religione,Religione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教,宗教多元主义,宗教多元论,宗教间关系 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 二值原理,宗教,宗教,宗教多元主義,宗教多元論,宗教間關係 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Bivalência,Diferença,Diálogo inter-religioso,Diálogo inter-religioso,Pluralismo religioso,Religião,Religião |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Двухвалентность,Межрелигиозный диалог,Различие (философия),Религиозный плюрализм,Религия (мотив),Религия |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Διαθρησκειακός διάλογος,Διαφορά,Διδυναμία,Δισθενικότητα,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία,Θρησκευτικός πλουραλισμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Religiöse Vielfalt , Interreligiöse Beziehung,Interreligiöse Begegnung,Interreligiöser Kontakt,Religionskontakt , Zweiwertigkeit,Zweiwertigkeitsprinzip,Bivalenzprinzip,Prinzip der Zweiwertigkeit , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie |