On comparative religious ethics as a field of study
This essay is a critical engagement with recent assessments of comparative religious ethics by John Kelsay and Jung Lee. Contra Kelsay's proposal to return to a neo-Weberian sociology of religious norm elaboration and justification, the authors argue that comparative religious ethics is and sho...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley
[2014]
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2014, Volume: 42, Issue: 2, Pages: 358-384 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Virtue ethics
/ Comparative religion
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion NCB Personal ethics |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 153973577X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20170419180030.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160519s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jore.12060 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)153973577X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)469735775 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ469735775 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1027831478 |0 (DE-627)729878538 |0 (DE-576)189933984 |4 aut |a Bucar, Elizabeth M. | |
| 109 | |a Bucar, Elizabeth M. |a Bucar, Elizabeth |a Bucar, Liz | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On comparative religious ethics as a field of study |c Elizabeth M. Bucar and Aaron Stalnake |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2014] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This essay is a critical engagement with recent assessments of comparative religious ethics by John Kelsay and Jung Lee. Contra Kelsay's proposal to return to a neo-Weberian sociology of religious norm elaboration and justification, the authors argue that comparative religious ethics is and should be practiced as a field of study in active conversation with other fields that consider human flourishing, employing a variety of methods that have their roots in multiple disciplines. Cross-pollination from a variety of disciplines is a strength of comparative ethics, which has enlivened recent and ongoing research on ethics, not a problem to be resolved by convergence on a single, distinctively comparative project. The authors also argue in response to Lee and Kelsay that while individual comparative studies of virtue and personal formation can be flawed in various ways, this line of research has been productive and at times very compelling. Moreover, attention to comparative virtue ethics shows how scholarship on some ethical topics necessitates drawing on a variety of perspectives and disciplinary backgrounds, a conclusion relevant to all work in religious ethics today. | ||
| 652 | |a AA:NCB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4526273-1 |0 (DE-627)253007356 |0 (DE-576)213345161 |2 gnd |a Tugendethik |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4455022-4 |0 (DE-627)228234212 |0 (DE-576)212611542 |2 gnd |a Vergleichende Religionswissenschaft |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1100695427 |0 (DE-627)859499944 |0 (DE-576)258199407 |4 aut |a Stalnaker, Aaron | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1973 |g 42(2014), 2, Seite 358-384 |w (DE-627)129432709 |w (DE-600)193054-0 |w (DE-576)014804743 |x 0384-9694 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2014 |g number:2 |g pages:358-384 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)182238852X |k Electronic | ||
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Kelsay, John, 1953 - |t Response to papers for "ethnography, anthropology, and comparative religious ethics" focus |d 2010 |w (DE-627)1537581201 |w (DE-576)467581207 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Kelsay, John, 1953 - |t The present state of the comparative study of religious ethics |d 2012 |w (DE-627)1451443064 |w (DE-576)38144306X |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Lee, Jung H., 1974 - |t The rhetoric of context |d 2013 |w (DE-627)1523445394 |w (DE-576)45344539X |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Lee, Jung H., 1974 - |t Comparative religious ethics among the ruins |d 2014 |w (DE-627)1539757471 |w (DE-576)469757477 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Kelsay, John, 1953 - |t Response to Bucar and Stalnaker |d 2014 |w (DE-627)1539756467 |w (DE-576)469756462 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12060 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 42 |j 2014 |e 2 |h 358-384 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2925012841 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 153973577X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20160819172338 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160519||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052813 |a NCB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042966 |a AA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Comparative religion,Virtue ethics |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Sciences religieuses comparées,Éthique de la vertu |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Ciencias de la religión comparadas,Ética de la virtud |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Etica delle virtù,Scienze religiose comparate |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 比较宗教 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 德性倫理學,比較宗教 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ciências da religião comparadas,Ética da virtude |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Сравнительное религиоведение,Этика добродетели |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ηθική των αρετών,Συγκριτική θρησκειολογία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||