On the Eirobiblical

The Bible (as it tends to do) supported both the justification of and resistance to American slavery as it was practiced in the antebellum era. Slaveholders and abolitionists alike “re-wrote” the Bible, attempting to bolster the legitimacy of their respective sides. Most scholarly treatments of thes...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cooper Harriss, M. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2013
In: Biblical interpretation
Year: 2013, Volume: 21, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 469-493
Further subjects:B Irony African American Slavery Nat Turner Oral Eirobiblical
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1463962533
003 DE-627
005 20221219173856.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 131001s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15685152-2145P0002  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1463962533 
035 |a (DE-576)393962539 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ393962539 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Cooper Harriss, M.  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a On the Eirobiblical 
264 1 |c 2013 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The Bible (as it tends to do) supported both the justification of and resistance to American slavery as it was practiced in the antebellum era. Slaveholders and abolitionists alike “re-wrote” the Bible, attempting to bolster the legitimacy of their respective sides. Most scholarly treatments of these biblical interpretations discuss the myriad ways that agents (ranging from the nominally literate to the literary) deploy generally stable readings and reinscriptions of biblical passages as they apply to their contemporary circumstances. Enslaved Americans, however, tended to encounter the Bible orally/aurally as illiterate people, hearing it performed at second- or third-hand and assimilating its language and stories at considerable distance from the canonical “text.” Furthermore, most examples we possess of this language reside in contested documents narrated by the enslaved to problematic scribes. This essay explores how the enslaved wielded the inherent imprecision of their biblical language to articulate coherent, if ironic, biblical worldviews. Assessing the rhetorical and even semiotic distinctions between these two modes of biblical interpretation, I develop a category (“eirobiblical rhetoric”) that facilitates critical engagement with the instabilities that result from such rhetoric as it engages particularly with the political and social exigencies of a religiously ordered (and “justified”) system of chattel slavery. A series of close readings in the 1831 document The Confessions of Nat Turner, an exemplary text of eirobiblical rhetoric, allow for the critical application of this new rhetorical category in a way that offers an unprecedented and liberating interpretation of a troublesome and disputed text.
 
650 4 |a Irony  |x African American  |x Slavery  |x Nat Turner  |x Oral  |x Eirobiblical 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Biblical interpretation  |d Leiden : Brill, 1993  |g 21(2013), 4/5, Seite 469-493  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)32764902X  |w (DE-600)2044259-2  |w (DE-576)094400830  |x 1568-5152  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:2013  |g number:4/5  |g pages:469-493 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685152-2145P0002  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo  |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2768878057 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1463962533 
LOK |0 005 20170808152135 
LOK |0 008 131001||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB