Toward Pentecostal Prolegomena II: A Rejoinder to Andrew Gabriel
This rejoinder responds to the recent exchange begun by Andrew Gabriel concerning the viability of divine impassibility within Pentecostal circles. The article hopes to make clearer the guiding assumptions and ends that drove the original article in question, particularly in terms of how the witness...
| Опубликовано в: : | Journal of pentecostal theology |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
2012
|
| В: |
Journal of pentecostal theology
|
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
prolegomena
Pentecostal theology
divine attribution
classical theism
divine impassibility
|
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Итог: | This rejoinder responds to the recent exchange begun by Andrew Gabriel concerning the viability of divine impassibility within Pentecostal circles. The article hopes to make clearer the guiding assumptions and ends that drove the original article in question, particularly in terms of how the witness and reception of Christian tradition and the explicit and ongoing recognition of the analogical constitution of God-talk can further serve the efforts of constructive Pentecostal theology, particularly as they relate to the doctrine of God and divine attribution. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5251 |
| Второстепенные работы: | In: Journal of pentecostal theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/174552512X633358 |